ddp-logoddp-logoddp-logoddp-logo
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
    • Who we are
    • Our partners
    • Our Impact
    • The History of DDP
  • OUR WORK
    • Connecting Communities – Our Theory of Change
    • Citizen Engagement Program
    • CSO Mentoring and Strengthening Program
    • Community of Practice
    • Democracy, Voter & Civic Education
    • Open Society Foundation Project
    • Parliamentary Program
    • Political Party Capacity Development
    • Traditional Leadership, Politics, And Governance
    • Women in Politics
    • Youth in Democracy Programme
  • EVENTS
    • Current Events
    • Past Events
  • BLOG
  • RESOURCES
    • Annual Reports
    • DDP Manuals
    • Media Statements
    • Newsletters
    • Podcasts/Talk Shows
    • Publications
  • CONTACT US
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
    • Who we are
    • Our partners
    • Our Impact
    • The History of DDP
  • OUR WORK
    • Connecting Communities – Our Theory of Change
    • Citizen Engagement Program
    • CSO Mentoring and Strengthening Program
    • Community of Practice
    • Democracy, Voter & Civic Education
    • Open Society Foundation Project
    • Parliamentary Program
    • Political Party Capacity Development
    • Traditional Leadership, Politics, And Governance
    • Women in Politics
    • Youth in Democracy Programme
  • EVENTS
    • Current Events
    • Past Events
  • BLOG
  • RESOURCES
    • Annual Reports
    • DDP Manuals
    • Media Statements
    • Newsletters
    • Podcasts/Talk Shows
    • Publications
  • CONTACT US
  • SUBSCRIBE
✕
MINORITY FRONT COUNCILLOR SHARES HOW DDP SHAPED HIS GROWTH
June 6, 2019
DDP CIVIC EDUCATION PROGRAM
June 6, 2019

CONFUSION, NOT CONSENSUS, IS DRIVING SA’S LAND EXPROPRIATION DEBATE

Published by DDP Admin on June 6, 2019
Categories
  • Blog
Tags

By: Dr Paul Kariuki (DDP Programs Director): For decades, equality of all has been a contentious issue in South Africa, even with an enabling Constitution and a Bill of Rights. The land question has come at a time when the political climate in South Africa is highly charged. And with scanty details about how the land will be distributed and how it will impact the nation’s economic status, there is a cause for anxiety.

The reality is that access to land is a highly emotive matter in any country. This is because of the economic importance attached to it as an appreciable asset. It therefore evokes charged emotions whenever a subject such as land expropriation without compensation comes up for debate.

Earlier this year, President Cyril Ramaphosa, while addressing the National House of Traditional Leaders, informed the nation that the issue of land expropriation would unfold in a manner that did not pose a threat to the national food security, implying that it would be done in a manner that boosted agricultural production while redistributing it back to those from whom it was taken, through wide-ranging consultations with all stakeholders.

According to the latest available figures from 2017 land audit, most of the land in South Africa is owned by white people – 72% in rural areas (in the form of farms and agricultural holdings) and 49% in urban areas. It is undeniable that in the interests of land equity and justice in the country, land redistribution is necessary in the interest of reversing the past injustices that led land inequity.

However, it is imperative to remember that land in South Africa has always been expropriated in the past without compensation through legislation.

Given this historical background, the socioeconomic and political consequences of the recent call for a constitutional amendment for land expropriation without compensation cannot be overlooked. Whatever the measures that will be taken even after repealing section 25 of the Constitution, any amendments must be constitutional.

First, it is important to ask why did the land restitution programs collapse? This is a national conversation that the government ought to convene and engage with citizens and stakeholders across the country.

Second, it is important that the issue of land compensation not to be racially determined, because following this approach breaches the constitutional rights that all citizens enjoy regardless of their racial background. There is room for constructive dialogues to find amicable solutions to this debate without betraying our democratic imperatives of equality. However, if any piece of land is needed by the State for a public benefit, then the State is constitutionally permitted to engage with its owner irrespective of racial background of its owner and agree on a fair value of compensation as per Section 25(3) of the Constitution.

Third, because the Bill of Rights provides the framework through which rights of all citizens are protected, it must be used a legal instrument to facilitate land justice in the country. As emotive and complex as the subject is, there must be a willingness from the White landowners to come to the party and all parties involved in the process should negotiate in good faith. The dialogues must be authentic and well-facilitated to address all fears and concerns whilst exploring available possibilities to guide the restitution process.

Fourth, intense civic education on this matter is needed. It is a critical tool for enabling citizens understand their constitutional rights and duties including their duties to other citizens as members of society. The absence of civic education in academic programs in the country contributes largely to reactive responses by most citizens as there is still a knowledge gap as far as rights and responsibilities are concerned. This knowledge deficiency poses a threat to upholding the rule of law. Our nation needs civic education.

In conclusion, land redistribution is about restoring dignity to all citizens. Land redistribution is unavoidable. However, it must be done sensitively to ensure it does not reverse the gains of democracy and undermine the rule of law in the country. The process of engagement must be within the ambits of the Constitution.

Share
0
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /usr/www/users/ddpormvnrt/blog/wp-content/themes/betheme/includes/content-single.php on line 286 DDP Admin
DDP Admin

Related posts

November 22, 2022

South Africa the most unequal country in the world?


Read more
October 31, 2022

Reading equals holistic South African citizens


Read more
October 24, 2022

Why using data is important in strengthening political accountability and governance in the public sector in SA


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CELEBRATING 30 YEARS OF DEEPENING DEMOCRACY IN SOUTH AFRICA.

The Democracy Development Program (DDP) aims to deepen the practice of democracy in South Africa. We build strong and active communities that can hold those in power to account. Since our beginning in 1993 we have achieved this mission.

WHO WE ARE

An organization that promotes active citizen engagement in public life to hold those who are in power accountable.

WHERE WE ARE

32 Dullah Omar Lane (Masonic Grove), DDP House, 2nd Floor, Durban 4001

FOLLOW US

Connect with DDP on social media
Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on TwitterFollow Us on InstagramFollow Us on YouTubeFollow Us on Linked InFollow Us on TikTokFollow Us on Spotify