Strengthening Institutional Advocacy: Anti-Corruption Effectiveness of Civil Society in South Africa

Introduction

Corruption is pervasive and undermines democratic governance, economic development, and social justice worldwide. In South Africa, corruption has significantly eroded public trust in institutions and hindered efforts to achieve sustainable development (Mungiu‐Pippidi, 2023). Civil society organisations (CSOs) play a crucial role in addressing corruption through advocacy, policy engagement, and grassroots mobilisation. As South Africa assumes the G-20 chairship, an opportunity arises to strengthen institutional advocacy and enhance the effectiveness of CSOs in anti-corruption efforts. This article's crux is exploring how CSOs can leverage South Africa’s G-20 leadership to drive meaningful reforms and institutional accountability.

Following the end of apartheid in 1994, South Africa embarked on a democratic transition aimed at fostering good governance, economic inclusivity, and social justice. However, corruption has remained a persistent issue, often manifesting in public procurement fraud, political patronage, and misallocation of state resources. The transition to democracy saw increased corruption cases linked to weak institutional frameworks, lack of oversight, and systemic socio-economic disparities (Goyal, 2020).

Several high-profile corruption scandals have influenced public perceptions of governance in South Africa. One of the most notable was the Arms Deal Scandal of the late 1990s and early 2000s, which involved allegations of bribery and fraud in a multi-billion-rand arms procurement process (Chipkin & Swilling, 2018). More recently, the State Capture scandal, exposed through the Zondo Commission, highlighted the extent of corruption within key government institutions, particularly under the Jacob Zuma administration (Ismail & Richards, 2023). These incidents have eroded public trust in government institutions and emphasised the critical role of civil society in ensuring accountability.

The Role of Civil Society in Anti-Corruption Efforts

Civil society organisations act as watchdogs, advocates, and facilitators of policy reform in the fight against corruption. They work through investigative journalism, public interest litigation, and community mobilisation to expose corruption and demand accountability (Brinkerhoff & Wetterberg, 2016). In South Africa, prominent CSOs such as Corruption Watch, the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, and the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution (CASAC) have been instrumental in uncovering corrupt practices and promoting legal reforms.

CSOs often engage directly with communities to raise awareness about corruption and its socio-economic impact. Grassroots mobilisation involves empowering citizens to recognise and report corrupt activities in their localities. This strategy enhances civic engagement and creates a bottom-up approach to anti-corruption efforts, reinforcing democratic governance (Heywood, 2015).

Public awareness campaigns play a vital role in informing citizens about their rights, legal frameworks, and the detrimental effects of corruption on society. These campaigns disseminate information through various platforms, including social media, radio broadcasts, and educational workshops. By fostering a culture of accountability, public awareness initiatives contribute to reducing tolerance for corrupt practices (Mungiu‐Pippidi, 2023).

Institutional Advocacy and Anti-Corruption Governance

Institutional advocacy involves engaging policymakers, legislators, and government agencies to influence decision-making and policy reforms. CSOs in South Africa have adopted various advocacy strategies, including policy research, stakeholder engagement, and legislative lobbying, to push for anti-corruption measures. The effectiveness of institutional advocacy depends on factors such as political will, regulatory frameworks, and civic engagement (Johnston, 2014).

One of the successes of institutional advocacy in South Africa was the establishment of the Zondo Commission, which investigated state capture and corruption within government institutions. CSOs played a critical role in pushing for the commission’s formation and ensuring that its findings were disseminated to the public (Chipkin & Swilling, 2018). The advocacy efforts of CSOs have also led to legal reforms, such as the amendment of the Public Audit Act, which enhances the powers of the Auditor-General to hold corrupt officials accountable (Wright, 2021).

Despite these achievements, challenges remain in ensuring the implementation of anti-corruption policies. Political resistance, limited funding, and threats against whistleblowers and activists hinder the effectiveness of institutional advocacy. Strengthening collaboration between CSOs and international organisations can enhance their ability to hold governments accountable and push for policy reforms (Chang, Rusu, & Kohler, 2021).

South Africa’s G-20 Chairship: A Platform for Strengthening Institutional Advocacy

As the chair of the G-20, South Africa has an opportunity to position itself as a global leader in anti-corruption efforts. The G-20 Anti-Corruption Working Group (ACWG) provides a framework for member states to share best practices, enhance international cooperation, and develop policy recommendations to combat corruption (Goyal, 2020). South Africa can leverage its chairship to advocate for stronger institutional mechanisms that empower CSOs and promote transparency in governance.

One key area of focus should be strengthening the enforcement of anti-corruption laws and ensuring that international anti-corruption frameworks are effectively implemented at the national level. South Africa can champion initiatives that enhance the independence of anti-corruption institutions, such as the NPA and the Public Protector’s Office, by advocating for legal safeguards against political interference (Pillay, 2017). In addition, South Africa’s leadership in the G-20 can promote capacity-building programs that equip CSOs with the necessary tools to monitor and report corruption. This includes technical training on investigative techniques, digital tools for tracking illicit financial flows, and legal support for whistleblowers and activists (Simonović, 2018). Furthermore, South Africa can facilitate dialogue between governments, CSOs, and the private sector to foster multi-stakeholder approaches to anti-corruption. By creating platforms for engagement, the G-20 can help bridge the gap between policy formulation and implementation, ensuring that anti-corruption commitments translate into tangible actions (Goyal, 2020).

Challenges and Opportunities for CSOs in the G-20 Framework

While the G-20 presents a valuable opportunity for strengthening anti-corruption advocacy, several challenges must be addressed. One of the key challenges is the limited participation of CSOs in G-20 decision-making processes. Civil society often faces barriers in accessing high-level discussions, making it difficult to influence policy outcomes effectively (Asiedu & Ofori, 2022). South Africa can advocate for greater inclusivity by pushing for structured engagement mechanisms that allow CSOs to contribute to policy dialogues and monitor the implementation of anti-corruption commitments. Another challenge is the uneven implementation of anti-corruption policies across G-20 member states. While some countries have robust institutional frameworks, others face significant governance deficits that hinder effective anti-corruption enforcement (Goyal, 2020). South Africa can use its chairship to encourage peer-learning initiatives that enable countries to share best practices and address common challenges collaboratively. Despite these challenges, the G-20 framework offers numerous opportunities for CSOs to strengthen their advocacy efforts. Through international partnerships, CSOs can access funding, technical expertise, and strategic networks that enhance their capacity to combat corruption. Also, South Africa’s leadership in the G-20 can help promote policy coherence by aligning national anti-corruption strategies with global best practices (Chang, Rusu, & Kohler, 2021).

Conclusion and Policy Recommendations

The effectiveness of civil society in combating corruption in South Africa depends on the strength of institutional advocacy, legal frameworks, and international cooperation. As South Africa assumes the G-20 chairship, it has a unique opportunity to champion anti-corruption initiatives that empower CSOs, enhance transparency, and promote good governance. By leveraging its chairship in the G-20, South Africa can play a pivotal role in strengthening institutional advocacy and enhancing the effectiveness of civil society in the fight against corruption. Through sustained engagement, policy reforms, and international cooperation, South Africa can set a precedent for good governance and transparency domestically and globally.

Dr Sunday Israel Oyebamiji: A researcher and lecturer at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), South Africa

References

Asiedu, M. K., & Ofori, D. (2022). Democracy, corruption and income: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 5(8), 2320-2329.

Chang, Z., Rusu, V., & Kohler, J. C. (2021). The Global Fund: Why anti-corruption, transparency and accountability matter. Globalisation and Health, 17, 1-11.

Chipkin, I., & Swilling, M. (2018). Shadow State: The Politics of State Capture. Wits University Press.

Goyal, T. M. (2020). Anti-corruption agenda of the G20: Bringing order without law (No. 400). Working Paper.

Heywood, P. (Ed.). (2015). Routledge Handbook of political corruption. Abingdon: Routledge.

Ismail, Z., & Richards, R. (2023). State capture and serious organised crime in South Africa.

Johnston, M. (2014). Corruption, contention and reform: The power of deep democratisation. Cambridge University Press.

Mungiu‐Pippidi, A. (2023). Transparency and corruption: Measuring real transparency by a new index. Regulation & Governance, 17(4), 1094-1113.

Pillay, P. (2017). Anti-Corruption agencies in South Africa and Brazil and challenges. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(8), 1-14.

Simonović, B. (2018). Challenges in controlling, combating, and preventing corruption in developing countries. Fraud and corruption: Major types, prevention, and control, 181-211.

Wetterberg, A., & Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2016). The political economy of public reform adoption: patterns in twenty Indonesian districts. International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 476-512.

Wright, J. S. (2021). Legal perspectives on the prevention and minimisation of corruption for sustainability in South African municipalities (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University (South Africa).